Assessment of the Fujifilm GF 50mm f/three.5 R LM WR


At the moment, I’ll give you my ideas on the brand new Fujfilm GF 50mm f/3.5 R LM WR medium format lens.

There’s numerous debate on what precisely is the best focal size. To return down definitively on one aspect or one other can be to incite a degree of photographer-on-photographer crime within the remark part the horror of which, you wouldn’t quickly neglect. In case you add to that a point out of the worth of primes versus zooms and all heck is liable to interrupt free.

So, I’ll keep away from any point out of the “greatest” focal size and as an alternative speak about what’s quick turning into one among my “favourite” focal lengths, 40mm (on a full body sensor). Most prime customers wish to dwell between the traditional 35mm subject of view and the traditional 50mm subject of view. How might each be regular? Nicely, as a result of there are as many definitions of regular as there are photographers and everybody has their very own private choice.

For me, 35mm is probably the most wise. It’s large sufficient for many functions, but not so large that it could’t be used for tighter portraits. But, for no matter cause, I’ve by no means fallen in love with the focal size myself. Maybe I really feel prefer it’s neither right here nor there. Maybe it is simply because I want the added attain that a 50mm provides me. It permits me to be shut sufficient to my mannequin to not must shout, however far sufficient away as to not must invade their private area to border a closeup. The draw back of the narrower subject of view being that generally, it’s too slim, like within the case of taking pictures an environmental portrait in a decent area.

Enter the 40mm. It wasn’t a focal size I used to be accustomed to till I bought a Fuji X-T3 a pair years in the past. I bought the digital camera to be my private “strolling round” digital camera and goal primary was to get a lens that might permit the setup to be as small as doable. I did a little bit of looking and settled on the XF 27mm f/2.8 pancake lens. It wasn’t too costly, and it was sufficiently small to maintain the X-T3 pocketable (in a coat pocket).

Now, you might be saying to your self that I’ve spent all this time speaking about 40mm and now 27mm, and have but to say something concerning the 50mm talked about within the title of this assessment. So I ought to in all probability take a second to say, for individuals who don’t know, that equal focal lengths range relying on sensor dimension. So, the 27mm on the APS-C sized sensor of the X-T3 works out to roughly a 41mm in full body phrases. And, going the opposite course, the 50mm focal size on the Fuji medium format sensor can be roughly a 40mm equal if we have been discussing full body.

I make this comparability as a result of the instant kinship I discovered when utilizing the 40mm equal on the X-T3 is what acquired me most excited after I heard that Fuji can be making a 40mm equal for his or her medium format system.

What Our bodies Is This Lens Designed For?

The Fuji GF 50mm f/3.5 is designed to be used on Fuji medium format our bodies such because the GFX 50S, GFX 50R, and GFX 100.  Personally, I personal a GFX 100, so it was the physique I used for the aim of doing this assessment. Nevertheless, I believe ideally this lens can be paired with one of many smaller our bodies just like the 50S or 50R.  

The lens is small. Very small. That’s factor. That’s why I needed to make use of it. However, in my very own opinion, it might merely stability higher with the smaller our bodies, particularly a avenue shooter digital camera just like the 50R, versus the bigger GFX 100 with in-built battery grip.

However that’s solely a matter of my very own private style in ergonomics, not a measure of sharpness or lens high quality, which we’ll get to in a minute.

How Does The Lens Measure Up To Different Lenses In The GF Line?

By way of dimension, that is the smallest medium format lens Fuji produces which can come as no shock after studying my opening. It is available in at simply 335g and stands out simply 1.89 inches from the entrance of the digital camera physique. This lens is designed for portability and also you gained’t discover anything prefer it within the medium format world.

How Does It Look?

Far be it from me to additional the narrative that Fuji house owners are as involved with the way in which their digital camera’s look as they’re with picture high quality. However, yeah, a part of the rationale I like Fuji cameras is the design. There, I mentioned it.

Now that we’ve gotten that out of the way in which, how does the lens look connected to the entrance of the digital camera? The lens itself appears fairly good. The lens hood? It’s not unhealthy, but it surely’s acquired this considerably unusual form that isn’t my favourite. Then once more, the 27mm of the X-T3 isn’t my favourite wanting lens both. But, I nonetheless use it on a regular basis. So, it’s an admittedly small gripe.

However How Does It Ship In Phrases of Picture High quality? 

I lined up the 50mm subsequent to the opposite Fuji GF lenses in my possession, the 45mm f/2.8, the 63mm f/2.8, the 32-64mm f/4, and the 110mm f/2. I propped up a mannequin, on this case a rented Fuji X100F, and proceeded to take equivalent photographs with every lens. I’m not DXOMARK and don’t declare to be the main authority in scientific lens testing. However, I did wish to see in sensible phrases if there was any notable distinction between every lens.

Unsurprisingly, I discovered little or no distinction between the lenses when it comes to sharpness. No less than not in a method that anybody would discover besides probably the most demanding of pixel peepers. The 50mm to my very own eyes gave the impression to be sharpest when shot between f/5.6 and f/11. Most lenses are sharpest between 1 to 2 stops in from large open.

And what concerning the bokeh? If you’re obsessive about bokeh, and, let’s be trustworthy, who isn’t, you then gained’t be shocked to know that the 110mm f/2 is probably the most magical large open. I imply, actually, have a look at this.

The 50mm f/three.5 shot large open is a good performer. Curiously, I personally most popular the 32-64mm shot at f/four to the 50mm shot at f/three.5.  However that’s private opinion. Here’s a fast bokeh comparability among the many lens in my possession so you may resolve for your self.

So How Does It Carry out In The Actual World?

For me, not less than, a lens’ utility is simply partially decided by its mathematical sharpness. I’ve a number of lenses in my bag that rating extremely on sharpness exams that I by no means take out of my bag just because the focal size isn’t helpful for what I have to shoot. Or, maybe, it’s helpful, however one thing concerning the ergonomics of the lens simply doesn’t really feel proper to me. The insane subjectivity of why one lens feels proper to at least one photographer and mistaken to a different is a subject for one more essay. However, secure to say, that my curiosity on this lens was pushed much more by it’s small stature and simple dealing with versus photographs of a spotlight chart. So what did I uncover within the subject? 

The scale of the Fuji GF 50mm let’s you understand that it was designed to be used as an on a regular basis lens. So both for journey photographers who will probably be out all day with their cameras, panorama photographers who have to hike to distant areas, or avenue photographers who wish to transfer about incognito (or as incognito as you may be with a medium format digital camera). So, my first transfer with the lens was to go on an off-the-cuff walkabout as that is the place I’d most definitely be utilizing this lens.

Though I used to be carrying the heavier GFX 100 physique, the load distinction between the GF 50mm and its bigger siblings is noticeable.  I think about on a GFX 50R physique the elevated nimbleness can be much more pronounced.

As I discussed earlier, I discover the 50mm (40mm full body equal) to be a really versatile focal size. It’s straightforward to make use of on every thing from landscapes to portraits. I additionally observed that the main target velocity of the 50mm appears to be snappier than my 45mm and 63mm. This can be because of the smaller dimension placing much less stress on the focusing motors, but it surely was fairly fast to snap into focus.

As I used to be out with the digital camera, I wanted to take a slight detour to get a smog examine for my getting older Toyota. In case you don’t dwell in California and don’t know what a smog examine is, then congratulations. However, not less than this gave me a cause to seize the 50mm and do a little bit of a walkabout to see if I might discover something attention-grabbing.

I didn’t must go far. I didn’t even have to depart the property really. As I headed for the sidewalk, I ran into somebody greater than prepared to assist. To be extra particular, he ran into me. Or was it a she? Let’s name it a he. Let’s name it Phil. Phil is a kind of now ubiquitous air crammed flopping balloons/parachutes/mannequins made within the form of a human being that float wildly with each gust of wind outdoors of automotive dealerships, sandwich retailers, or just about anyplace needing of your consideration.

Phil can be, because it seems, a very good option to check steady autofocus. I’ve written earlier than about how the continual autofocus on the Fuji medium format our bodies can generally wrestle to maintain up with swiftly shifting topics. So, I wasn’t anticipating a lot from this encounter apart from quite a few unusual appears from folks passing by questioning why I used to be apparently dancing with a human balloon. However, I’ll say that I used to be pleasantly shocked. When the wind will get going, Phil whips round relatively rapidly and unpredictably. Setting the GFX 100 to Steady Autofocus and Vast Monitoring I locked onto Phil and simply held the shutter down hoping for the perfect. The 50mm focus velocity really did a very good job of maintaining, making it one of many sooner focusing of the Fuji GR lenses.

As for handbook focus, the small kind issue of the lens necessitates a smaller focusing ring than you can find on the opposite GR lenses. So, relying on the scale of your fingers, you might or might not discover this to be an issue. The ring operation is easy and environment friendly, and paired with the wonderful handbook focus help instruments from Fuji nonetheless makes for simple changes.

Minimal focus distance is acknowledged as being 1.eight toes. This feels correct. I discovered that I used to be capable of get inside simply much less of an arms size from the topic earlier than the digital camera would give me that pesky crimson autofocus failure warning. However apart from potential macro work, which would not be this  lenses supposed objective, I don’t see this as being one thing that might be prohibitive.

For portrait shooters on the market, I did step in entrance of the lens myself to check to see if there was vital distortion. As this lens lives between a 35mm and 50mm full body equal, there isn’t actually any distracting distortion. If you’re purely a portrait shooters, you’ll undoubtedly wish to try the 110mm. However if you happen to want wider lenses in your portraits as I usually do, you gained’t end up battling the GR 50mm.

What I Preferred

  • Small kind issue
  • Versatile focal vary 
  • Marginally sooner autofocus in comparison with different Fuji Primes

What I Disliked

  • Bokeh is sweet, however not pretty much as good a another GF lenses
  • Minimal focus distance sufficient, however not stellar
  • Considerably odd wanting lens hood


If you’re on the lookout for a light-weight prime in your Fuji GFX system, I don’t suppose you may actually go mistaken with the brand new Fujifilm GF 50mm f/three.5 R LM WR. Different lenses have extra attain. Different lenses have sooner apertures. But when your aim is to take advantage of moveable medium format package doable, you gained’t end up sacrificing any high quality with the intention to attain that aim.

Whether or not you could possibly use this as your solely prime goes again to that proverbial query of what you personally really feel is the perfect focal size.  Personally, I might undoubtedly see myself giving up the additional cease afforded by the 45mm and 63mm with the intention to have a barely smaller lens that matches properly in between and might cowl a variety of topics. Solely you may resolve if that method would give you the results you want, but it surely’s effectively price testing.