Trump lawyer argues towards Afghan struggle crimes investigation


THE HAGUE (Information) – A lawyer for U.S. President Donald Trump argued on the Worldwide Legal Courtroom on Wednesday that prosecutors had been flawed to hunt an investigation into alleged struggle crimes in Afghanistan that would doubtlessly implicate U.S. troopers.

ICC judges in April rejected the request of prosecutor Fatou Bensouda to look at atrocities allegedly dedicated between 2003 and 2014, together with alleged mass killings of civilians by the Taliban, in addition to prisoner torture by Afghan authorities and to a lesser extent by U.S. forces and the CIA.

Trump lawyer Jay Sekulow, talking as a “pal of the court docket” within the case, stated that the prosecutor was flawed to “press forward” with looking for to open an investigation when america just isn’t a member of the court docket.

As well as, beneath the “complementarity precept”, the ICC has jurisdiction solely when nations themselves are unwilling or unable to prosecute struggle crimes.

“The U.S. is demonstrably each keen and in a position to examine its personal circumstances, so on the premise of complementarity (this investigation) needs to be thrown out,” he stated.

Trump has denounced the ICC, the world’s solely everlasting struggle crimes court docket, for its “broad, unaccountable, prosecutorial powers”. Washington revoked U.S. journey visas for ICC personnel in response to its work on Afghanistan.

Attorneys representing victims of the Afghanistan battle on Wednesday urged the ICC to permit the investigation to proceed.

Lawyer Fergal Gaynor known as the hearings “an historic day for accountability in Afghanistan”. The 82 victims he represented had been “united” in wanting an investigation, he stated.

In a earlier choice in April, judges had rejected prosecutor Bensouda’s request to open a proper investigation, saying possibilities of a profitable prosecution had been small.

The prosecution has appealed towards that call and is arguing the case in three days of hearings earlier than a panel of appeals judges in The Hague.


U.S. forces and different overseas troops entered Afghanistan in 2001 following the Sept. 11 assaults on america and overthrew the Taliban authorities, which had been defending al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden. In what has change into america’ longest struggle, about 13,000 U.S. troops stay there.

In findings from a preliminary examination, which precedes an precise investigation to assemble proof, Bensouda stated the Taliban and their associates had been answerable for greater than 17,000 civilian deaths till 2015 and there was a “affordable foundation” to consider that they had dedicated crimes towards humanity and struggle crime by murdering civilians.

The examination additionally discovered a “affordable foundation” to consider that Afghan authorities had dedicated widespread torture towards detainees on a “massive scale”.

It additionally discovered there was a “affordable foundation” to consider armed U.S. forces had “subjected no less than 61 individuals to torture” between Could 2003 and December 2014. Individually, members of the U.S. Central Intelligence Company “seem to have subjected no less than 27 detained individuals to torture in Afghanistan, Poland, Romania and Lithuania.”

One other authorized consultant of victims, Katherine Gallagher, who acts for 2 Guantanamo Bay detainees, harassed that up to now no high-level U.S. official has been held accountable for alleged violations of the foundations of struggle in Afghanistan or at CIA “black” websites.

“The opening of an investigation into the U.S. torture program would clarify that nobody is above the regulation,” she instructed judges.

The ICC, which opened in 2002, has jurisdiction over struggle crimes, genocide and crimes towards humanity if they’ve been dedicated by nationals of a signatory state or in the event that they befell on the territory of one among its members. Afghanistan is a member, america just isn’t.

The ICC is empowered to behave solely when a rustic is discovered to be unable or unwilling to look at misdeeds by its personal navy and leaders. It has struggled resulting from prosecutorial missteps and opposition, not least from america, Russia and China.

Reporting by Stephanie van den Berg and Anthony Deutsch; Writing by Toby Sterling. Modifying by Angus MacSwan